Tuesday, January 15, 2008

In Defense of Multiply

There have been petitions going around, calling for a Multiply boycott on the 18th of January, Friday. This is in light of Multiply's recent move to limit music-sharing among its users. One of those rants can be read here.

This blog is being written in response to Budi's message asking me what my stand is on the issue. I could not have been bothered at all simply because I did not feel the seemingly collective outrage that this move has elicited. But alas, my opinion was requested. So now let me tell you why I am not joining the boycott.

Eversince I can remember, Multiply has always had a note on its "upload music" page that goes like this, "By clicking upload, you certify that these files do not violate Multiply's Terms of Service and that you own all copyrights or have express permission from all copyright owners to upload them." Or something like that. In fact I can vaguely remember that at some point, Multiply stated a warning saying that Multiply has the right to take down music that did not pass rules on the copyright law. Or something like that. It might have been tweaked a bit over the years but we are all aware that Multiply was never lacking in informing its users that sharing copyrighted materials is bad. Therefore we are not to do it. That we have been naughty and did it anyway is not Multiply's fault. That Multiply was lax in implementing the rules had always been something we enjoyed and cheered for, and hoped would last forever.

And then Multiply is sued.

Is it now Multiply's fault that it has decided to be stricter?

"Oh, but Multiply lured us with its promise of free music! And now that they have the numbers to attract advertisers, they'll go back on their promise. We mean nothing to them!"

I'm only grateful that there was a time when we were able to access free copyrighted music when we really shouldn't. That's better than nothing, right? Besides, again, its promise of free music has always had a note attached to it that goes something like, "as long as its yours," and "as long as you have permission from the owner."

So there.

Stop whining.

17 comments:

  1. hi joni...thnx for the blog...you really write good...i just hope you sent it to all multiply users. thnx again =)

    ReplyDelete
  2. sinabi mo.

    these younger kids...are sooo... i dunno... ditzy! napaka self absorbed ng reason nila for this boycott. if they put themselves in multiply's shoes theyd see that the advertisers money will NOT be enough to pay off big lawsuits from several record companies. we dont even know if multiply is rich or just breaking even. and its not like these boycotters are shelling out money to keep this feature.

    actually pumatol pako & told them I WONT be joining coz i dont believe ONE DAY of BOYCOTT will affect Multiplys stand on this (or their revenues even). Magonline petition kaya sila & stay off for weeks! even then, i doubt Multiply will change their minds.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Nairita nga ako. It's like they've been done some terrible injustice to. Hello! Kayo na nga yung nakinabang all this time 'no! May pa-boycott-boycott pang nalalaman. Ayun lang. Hehehe!

    ReplyDelete
  4. ive blogged too much in here & spent many sweet nights uploading not just music but videos & photos. it makes more sense than going to youtube & then flickr & then livejournal/blogspot diba? im not gonna let a bunch of anal + ditzy music lovers kuno force multiply to keep the download feature intact & risk having multiply shut down completely. grrr. self righteous pigs. magbittorent kaya kayo, mga bobo! hehe

    ReplyDelete
  5. What's even sadder is that some of these people aren't even kids anymore. Still, they can't see beyond their noses.

    ReplyDelete
  6. hehehe wala lang silang mabilis na internet connection at torrent client kaya puro sila sa multiply naka-depend. hehehehehehe.

    ReplyDelete
  7. i'm new here but i agree with joni. =)

    ReplyDelete
  8. may i suggest if you please, that all posts to this blog be sent to all users...thnx to all...keep multiplying, ok...joni, may your tribe increase...or should i say multiply in geometric progression...;)

    ReplyDelete
  9. Concordo com su actitud.....
    y queria sugerir que envie este Post para "ALL", y no sólo para tus Contactos.

    Es importante, es necesario para clarear las cosas.....

    Gracias amiga!!

    ReplyDelete
  10. hahah i post mo daw to your network, joni :)

    ReplyDelete
  11. Sigh. People, I don't know what else you want me to do with this post. It already IS for everyone. Feel free to lead people to, quote from and/or forward this post to all your contacts.

    Pambihira, ako na nga nagsulat, ako pa sa marketing. Kayo naman.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Do more marketing, Joni! Also post a picture of, I dunno, a pirate? HUHLOLZ

    But srsly, I was depressed when I heard the news about this "great injustice", but come on. It had to happen sooner or later. So meh.

    ReplyDelete
  13. i didn't even know there was a petition. or that multiply was sued. or anything connected to this whole 'big issue.' maybe because i never upload music in the first place. haha!

    ReplyDelete
  14. no real online petitions yet (i think). just a global plan to boycott for a day.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I wrote about this once before...kind of. I would link the blog entry but I have to view multiply through a web proxy as multiply is blocked in China at the moment, so I can't link the proper url. Anyhow, my rant about the music industry was from June 1, 2007. The crux of it is that the music industry ripped off the US public over $480 million (who knows how much other countries were swindled) and paid almost no penalty for it.

    Anyone who is downloading music from these crooks is a hero in my book. Maybe we can't do it on multiply but it will continue elsewhere.

    There was a great injustice committed by the record labels and they got away with it at the time... now the bad kharma is coming back to them as it should.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I read that entry, Jason, and I do agree with you on that point. But what my entry is about is that Multiply did not do anything to justify a boycott. Like you said, the great injustice is committed by the record labels. Not Multiply.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I somehow overlooked this post..

    This boycott stuff only shows how ignorant people are. Strangely I just posted my second reply to one such person in this thread and came across your post here within a few minutes of that.

    ReplyDelete