Monday, June 2, 2008

On My Lack of a Lovelife

About a week ago, I overheard my sister Nuna telling our friends that she wished I would finally get myself a boyfriend, the reason being it had been a long time since I last had one. She would probably only know that I heard her when she reads this... which is right about... now. There. Hmp, talking about me behind my back. :p

And then last Saturday, after a hearty meal in Tapa King and while waiting for the halo-halo, she said that maybe I should go out more so I could meet more boylets. I had to ask again to clarify that she meant "me," as in, "I" have to go out more? Yes, of course. For a while I thought we were gossiping about someone. So where do I go about finding this boylet who has the ability to magically change my life? "Why don't you join one of those dating events?" "Speed dating?" "Yes!"

Now, I am a very lazy person. In addition to that, I am also very stingy. I refuse to join speed dating events (even as I had helped organize one before) because I would much rather buy myself something nice instead of paying for an overpriced dinner. Not that I don't believe in speed dating. I just cannot bring myself to cough up the money required to attend one.

And I do admit to having very high standards. Well-meaning friends would ask, "So what's your type?" hoping to set me up with their single guy friends. Without batting an eyelash, I would retort, "Why, nothing short of perfection." "No, really, what's your type?" as if I was joking. "Really, he has to be perfect." "But nobody's perfect," would come the reply, four out of five times, I swear. But you asked for my type and that's my type!

Of course "perfect" is relative. It's just that I don't want to have to enumerate all of these traits that everyone wants anyway. Really, would you rather that I rattle off smart (oops, not just smart... more like brilliant), sweet, charming, sensitive, responsible, sincere, affectionate, funny, articulate, successful, ambitious, kind, loving, cute, and open-minded? In random order, of course. I mean, would you? And doesn't it already follow that any woman would want a man who's all of those and then some?

And then people would ask why I don't have a boyfriend. Because there's a dearth of brilliant, sweet, charming, sensitive, responsible, sincere, affectionate, funny, articulate, successful, ambitious, kind, loving, cute, and open-minded men that's why! (In the remote chance that you are all of these, AND a man--a straight man, that is, and single--that's important too!; please come forward.)

Not that I haven't seriously wondered enough about my lack of a lovelife. In fact, I've wondered so much that I have gotten so sick and tired of wondering about it. Now I just spend the time reading about Mao Tse Tung's lovelife (the asshole, cheating on his wife!) because really, what else is there left to do?

Oh. And in another remote chance that you actually know of a living, breathing single straight man who is all of the adjectives above but who for some reason might not be able to read this, do me and my sister a favor and forward this to him. Thanks!

33 comments:

  1. i know someone who is all of that!!! pero di siya "cute." so nevermind ;p

    ReplyDelete
  2. Brilliant, sweet, charming, sensitive, responsible, sincere, affectionate, funny, articulate, successful, ambitious, kind, loving, cute, and open-minded men? Why, aren't you friends with the awesome men of The Man Blog?

    ReplyDelete
  3. you were interesting I sent you ebooks then :)

    ReplyDelete
  4. JasonTan: Of course "cute," too, is relative. Send me the picture then let's talk.

    Ade! But of course The Man Bloggers are all of those! Why else do I love every one of you, singularly and collectively?

    Jing, ad nga yan. That way I wouldn't have to spend money. Alam mo namang sukdulan ang kabaratan ko.

    Oliver, thanks for the ebooks! :D

    ReplyDelete
  5. i did? i don't remember having this conversation with anybody at all...

    *thinks hard

    no, really. when did this happen again?

    ReplyDelete
  6. jason tan! is this the person we want to set up nuni with? *i* think he's cute.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Ha! I could hear you from the other room, Nuna!

    ReplyDelete
  8. which other room? who was i talking to? *scratches head

    ReplyDelete
  9. Alzheimer's strikes again...! You were talking to the twins!!

    ReplyDelete
  10. i really don't.

    :o

    i wonder how many other conversations i've had that i just don't remember.

    ReplyDelete
  11. But do you at least concur that that conversation likely happened?

    ReplyDelete
  12. I don't remember this so called conversation. Hmmmm. i dont re-mem-ber lalalalalala, i dont re-mem-ber lalalalalaLA!

    ReplyDelete
  13. Do you really not remember, Brian? It happened! I heard her!

    ReplyDelete
  14. nuni -- why dont you answer my "boyfriend requirement" blog... para magkaidea ang mga taong gusto kang ikai-shao kung ano ang type mo :P

    ReplyDelete
  15. Anna, one word: tamad.

    Nuna, I cannot just make that up. It happened. In fact, I would probably have forgotten all about it if you had not told me to go out more last Saturday.

    ReplyDelete
  16. nah. this one's different. he's my imaginary friend.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Whaaat?! He's imaginary and he's still not cute?! I have lots of imaginary boyfriends and they're all... perfect!

    ReplyDelete
  18. well, kasi i don't imagine cute boys, only super cute girls live in my imagination.

    ReplyDelete
  19. lovely post!

    (i now have something to point to, when my pals will accuse me of having narrow specifications :D )

    ReplyDelete
  20. JasonTan, I have no use for cute girls!! Real or imaginary!!!

    Jester, narrow? Those aren't narrow! They're very reasonable.

    ReplyDelete
  21. You could always try lowering your standards... Mine for example, tend to be 'boobs, and the lack of mace'... Feel free to replace 'boobs' with a random male characteristic such as the ability to drool, or maybe the ability to address your face (if you're looking for that extra special someone) and you might find the field opens up significantly :-p

    ReplyDelete
  22. Um, although it's true that I want all of those qualities above in a potential boyfriend, it should be noted that I am open to little compromises. For example, he does not have to be super articulate on all subjects all the time. Or when I say 'cute,' I don't exactly mean model-material cuteness. Sigh.

    ReplyDelete
  23. mmm, brown wall look like chocolate! *nom om nom* err, wake up call guys are retards....

    ReplyDelete
  24. Uhm parang I dont recall the conversation also!!!!! Hahaha your hearing things Nuni =)

    ReplyDelete
  25. Women seem to get scared when I am articulate. It intimidates them. They seem to prefer off the cuff wit. They feel ok admiring that as I don't care if they get it or not, and I can't expect them to join in. Sigh. It gets lonely.

    I just talk to myself , its usually more interesting.
    http://www.okcupid.com/profile/Kimci

    ReplyDelete
  26. Whoa! This post is over two years old! Even so, thank you for dropping by. I can't check out your link yet though because okC is blocked at work. Well, let me assure you that I sympathize although I'm not super sure that is my problem exactly. *sighs. I don't even know anymore.

    ReplyDelete